this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
29 points (91.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

67958 readers
92 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Zoom in x200

Left: 720p x264 --> 0.25 GB

Right: 1080p x265 --> 1.11 GB

I tested watching both on my phone:

  • Without zoom, I didn’t notice much difference in visuals.
  • The audio is stronger at the same level on the x265 version.
  • I need +15 volume level (Android) to make the x264 sound equal.

What do you think, guys? Is it worth 4 times the file size?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)

For watching on a phone, probably not.

For watching on a real TV, definitely.

If you're downloading for a permanent collection, I'd get the 1080p version. If you're downloading temporarily to keep on your phone, then save the space.

[–] Trincapinones@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Based on the TRaSH Guides, x264 is better for 1080p content and x265 is only worth it for 2160p and above. But I don't know how they would compare in the case of 720p x264 vs 1080p x265. I think I would prefer 720p x264 if it had a higher bit rate.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 7 points 2 days ago

The biggest issue with downloading x265 stuff from the high seas is that so many of them are just x264 that's been re-encoded in x265, resulting in smaller file sizes but reduced quality as well. x265 is superior in almost every way technically speaking but it needs a good source material, not an x264 reencode. Their "golden rule" is more like a rule of thumb and I absolutely wouldn't use some blanket criteria like resolution or dynamic range.

[–] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

I checked out this guide, it's actually really informative, thanks.

[–] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'll just watch and delete, I should get 720p version then

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 1 points 2 days ago

I've noticed that things recorded on film hold up much better to low resolution compared to digitally filmed content.