this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
29 points (91.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

67941 readers
92 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Zoom in x200

Left: 720p x264 --> 0.25 GB

Right: 1080p x265 --> 1.11 GB

I tested watching both on my phone:

  • Without zoom, I didn’t notice much difference in visuals.
  • The audio is stronger at the same level on the x265 version.
  • I need +15 volume level (Android) to make the x264 sound equal.

What do you think, guys? Is it worth 4 times the file size?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Why not compare 720p 265 to 1080p 265? I don’t get anything in 264 these days, 265 support is ubiquitous and the performance is so much better.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

It's not just about codec and resolution, either. Every algorithm has a bunch of parameters that you can adjust, so you could get a 4k60hz video with a reasonable file size and still have it look like crap. And that's not even mentioning the audio quality.

[–] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago

Maybe the new ones, but most of the old rips are still x264.