this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
662 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

82329 readers
4371 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 52 points 5 days ago (18 children)

For anyone who doesn't know, this is because space is an absolutely terrible place to put computers. Getting power is actually the easiest problem to solve, and is still really hard, because building any kind of infrastructure in space is hard. Then you've got all that radiation you have to shield against because you're no longer protected by the Earth's atmosphere, and worst of all you've got the cooling problem because Jesus fucking Christ, space is not cold!

This is why I get annoyed every time a scifi movie shows people freezing to death in space. Because it leads to this level of mass delusion and then suddenly it matters and everyone just unquestioningly believes the lie that space is cold. Space is a vacuum. A vacuum is what your Contigo travel mug uses to keep your coffee scalding hot after four hours. If vacuums are that good at keeping something hot when it naturally wants to get colder, think about what they'll do to something that is actively generating heat. All of your components are going to cook.

There are proposals to put data centres at the bottom of the ocean that are substantially more credible than this idiocy.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 11 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Maybe we should put datacenters on Mars, to warm it up.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I'd rather on the moon. It'll melt all the cheese and there'll be fondue lakes!

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Whatever you do, don't put it on Jupiter! It'll get more stupider!

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What if we put it on Uranus though?

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 1 points 5 days ago

There should be a reductio ad uranum for talks about space, similar to the reductio ad hitlerum for political discussions.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)