Selfhosted

57133 readers

620 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.
No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

Tailscale n00b questions (reddthat.com)

submitted 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) by mrnobody@reddthat.com to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Playing around with a new self-host NAS OS, finally thought about Tailscale. But, I see it wants a login to an account. Checking online, seems I have to use Google, Apple, MS, Github or OIDC (which iassume costs money based on the site).

So how tf y'all setting to your tail scale stuff? I'm not using a big brother us tech account for auth on this thing. Think I'd rather go back to regular wireguard if that's the case.

Edit: OK I see you can use regular email. It didn't load the webpage correctly the first time or I missed it. Odd. Anyway, I do don't want an account add I don't want to risk any data compromise at some point

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

I went with Google.

Edit: I am just saying what I went with. I didn't have another fitting option.

[–] nfms@lemmy.ml 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I went with GitHub. In the end it's just an OAuth service, to provide identity. It's not used to gather data on you (just the same we already share by visiting regular websites).
I'm still gonna lookup Headscale and Wireguard because It's been on my radar.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 12 hours ago

Problem with plain Wireguard is if you can't open ports on some devices to get a direct connection. It should be just fine with hub and spoke model, but NAT Traversal of Tailscale makes a huge difference. I can get a direct connection between 2 devices connected to mobile data and behind CG-NAT.
And also the config management if you have too many devices.

Hub and spoke, you just add new devices to Wireguard on the main device, and the new peer. Full mesh, oof.

But as far as configuring Wireguard goes, that's pretty simple. And then there's the weird stuff with MTU and fragmentation... but that's not something Wireguard-specific.