Technology

59534 readers

3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

331

Stop wearing Vision Pro goggles while driving your Tesla: U.S. transportation officials, Calif. police (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

85 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Stop wearing Vision Pro goggles while driving your Tesla: U.S. transportation officials, Calif. police::Videos, many of them stunts or jokes, of people wearing Apple’s new virtual reality headset while driving Teslas in Autopilot mode prompted officials to issue warnings.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (9 children)

pretty good VR*: all of the user's field of vision is digitally (re-)created.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 2 points 9 months ago (8 children)

If you load up an AR app on your phone, it will often overlap the augmentation over the camera image. So I think reprojecting the outside world using cameras and augmenting that in VR is also a form of AR. Maybe we need a new name for this specifically, though? I don't know. But maybe AVR or VAR?

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

We don't need another name because it's a very common - almost expected - feature in VR headsets. My headset has monochromatic cameras for passthrough, but it's still a VR headset.

Also, often the whole idea is that this passthrough layer can be toggled at anytime or even gradually mixed with the computer-generated reality, so creating another name will just increase confusion.

[–] calavera@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'm not sure about your definition of AR, but if the camera is showing the real world plus digital content then it's augmented reality.

Here is some definition:

In virtual reality (VR), the users' perception of reality is completely based on virtual information. In augmented reality (AR) the user is provided with additional computer- generated information within the data collected from real life that enhances their perception of reality.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

showing the real world plus digital content then it’s augmented reality

But it isn't. AR means direct optical contact with the real world augmented with a digital / computer-generated layer. What Apple's VR does is recreate the real pov digitally using cameras, so it's VR.

Apple's tech builds a digital world and adds a "reality" layer on top - meaning the user only sees displays. AR's like Google Glass do the opposite, adding a digital layer on top of the real thing.

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I can assure you, there exists no such consensus on the definition of any of the terms.

The most universal you’ll get for AR is the combination of primarily real-world with some digital aspects.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality–virtuality_continuum

I’ve read extensively on the topic. Albeit a couple of years ago.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

According to that page I'd consider this headset to be augmented virtuality. But yeah these are all gray areas

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

The terms are up for definition, I’ve read a ton and there is no specific consensus about optically seeing reality

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)