this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
364 points (92.9% liked)

Memes

54779 readers
1588 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 15 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think that's accurate, though. How do you explain dialectical materialism, historical materialism, imperialism, why capitalism is fundamentally unsustainable, revolutionary strategy, and more in under an hour?

[–] naught101@lemmy.world -5 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

You can definitely explain most of those in a way a 5 year old could understand in under 20 minutes.

Not dialectical materialism though. I've read about it and had it explained to me more time than I can count, and my brain refuses to hold on to what it means.

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 1 points 43 minutes ago

From a Marxist-Leninist: there are some Marxist authors contesting the emphasis on the "dialectics" part of dialectical materialism. Paul Cockshott is a good example, you can search for Cockshott's criticism of dialectical materialism, maybe if the concepts don't stick to you you could have a more Newtonian materialist view

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I wrote a basic guide on dialectical materialism. It's missing a ton, but should be enough to hopefully make it make sense to start off with.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks. I'll try it, but I have zero faith it'll stick this time 😅

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Haha, no worries! Really, it's about materialism in outlook, dialectics in method. The rest follows from there!

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I read it. I've been reading a lot of complex systems science lately, and it seems to have a lot of overlap, so perhaps it will stick a bit harder this time. Thanks :)

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 hours ago

No problem, glad it helped!

[–] quips@slrpnk.net -4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

However else you explain any other concept, these are very simple ideas.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

How so? How can you simplify them to take less than an hour?

[–] quips@slrpnk.net -4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Explaining it to them without the fluff?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Elaborate, how do you explain all of them in under an hour, even without fluff?

[–] quips@slrpnk.net -3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

What are you asking for? Like my method of teaching?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I'm asking how you can fit the sheer quantity of raw information, effectively, into an hour. I'm entirely unconvinced that you could do so.

[–] quips@slrpnk.net -4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Well okay thats not something I could describe for you without actually doing it, and I’m not finna make an hour long course for you bro

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 hours ago

I’m not finna make an hour long course for you bro

Cringe

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Pick any of the core parts then, and try to accurately break it down into a small enough chunk. Explain dialectical materialism (not even historical materialism) in 5 minutes.

[–] quips@slrpnk.net -5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 13 hours ago

Cool, my latest effort to do so takes around 5-10 minutes to read, but I feel that I'm missing a lot of important factors.