this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
248 points (96.3% liked)

Greentext

7909 readers
346 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

IIRC the reason Luigi isn't in Mario 64 is that they couldn't afford the extra few kilobytes that would take.

It's not like they wanted parts of the game to be empty, cartridges were tiny. Mario 64 had a one megabyte cartridge. They had to cut things to the bone to manage to fit the game on that.

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Small correction - Mario 64 was on an 8MB cartridge.

There were some 4MB games, but a 1MB cartridge never existed.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Mmm. The source I found probably got megabytes and megabits mixed up. Cartridges often seemed to have their capacity listed in megabits for some reason.

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Yeah possibly, if they converted in the wrong direction.

There are 8 bits in a byte, so 8MB cartridges like Mario 64 were generally advertised as 64 Megabit. But if someone got mixed up they could’ve assumed the 8MB figure was actually 8Mbit and then divided by 8 to reach the wrong conclusion of 1MB.

As to why they advertised things using megabits back in the day, that’s pretty easy: bigger numbers seem more impressive in marketing!