this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
1390 points (95.4% liked)

Memes

47138 readers
1073 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cuerdo@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I would argue that the zodiac is the proto-science of psychology.

This is people trying to find behavioral patterns

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Faulty pattern recognition isn't something we should be holding on to.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is the alchemy to the chemistry is what they are saying

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So not at all based in science? Interesting as a historical curiosity but nothing more?

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting because of the psychological insights into not how all people are, but how people make up theories in general. Same way religion has scientific significance in an anthropological sense.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Perhaps "historical curiosity" was a little obtuse of me.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And how many people are still using Alchemy?

[–] beardown@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

"I turned 5 pounds of lead into gold this morning using this one weird trick that chemists HATE! Subscribe to my premium substack to learn more!"

[–] explodicle@local106.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They told us the history of alchemy in chemistry class, it's good to know the context.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

Yes, but no one credible still uses it. Which was the point I was making.

[–] cuerdo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is that we still don't have a proper pattern recognition. We could discard all the soft sciences such as Economics, Sociology or Psychology.

[–] psud@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What hard sciences could replace economics and sociology? They're not very rigorous, but they seem to be useful. Psychology also takes some load off psychiatrists

[–] cuerdo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So is palm reading; for grifters.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck those people who wanna categorize me so they can ignore who I actually am and just put a handle on me.

[–] cuerdo@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

No they don't. They want to put me in a neat little box for easy handling.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Then they should talk to me, rather than rely on generalizations that were created a couple of thousand years ago and revived by new age mystics.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just did a quick search and the difference between seeing astrology talk about fate vs personality is at least 1200 years apart.

[–] cuerdo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Economic Science is also about fate

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Cough... science...cough