They [the paper he's discussing] conclude that there's a community-member's "trilemma": a set of three priorities that can never be fully satisfied by any group. The trilemma consists of users' need to find:

a) A community of like-minded people;

b) Useful information; and

c) The largest possible audience.

The thing that puts the "lemma" in this "trilemma" is that any given group can only satisfy two of these three needs. It's hard to establish the kinds of intimate, high-trust bonds with the members of a giant, high-traffic group, but your small, chummy circle of pals might not be big enough to include people who have the information you're seeking.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I would say that’s not actually the key quote at all, especially since the author states that many times finding a smaller audience is the goal.

[–] emb@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

It's at least something to explain what the title's referencing. Acknowledging that smaller audiences are often preferred doesn't really seem at odds with that. It just points to A and B having higher priority than C, right?

But people should just read the article, it's pretty quick and has more context than the quote.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah the article is good.

[–] julian@activitypub.space 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

> @emb@lemmy.world said in Pluralistic: The online community trilemma: > > a) A community of like-minded people; > > b) Useful information; and > > c) The largest possible audience.

Calling it now. Join @fediverse@lemmy.world to discuss the fediverse. Join the smaller @fediverse@piefed.social to discuss the fediverse and rag on tankies.

/s?