this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
540 points (97.4% liked)

Linux

63925 readers
468 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fork time? Maybe all the anti-systemd zealots were right all along...

Edit: To address whether it is likely that this change will affect users: Gnome is planning a stronger dependence on userdb, the part of systemd where this change is being implemented. https://blogs.gnome.org/adrianvovk/2025/06/10/gnome-systemd-dependencies/

Final Edit: The PR has been merged into main.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Soot@hexbear.net 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The PR is explicitly for the purpose of complying with age verification laws. Damn fuckin' right I'm angry about it.

Is it cool if we start implementing tools to track users' race and sexual orientation for the explicit purpose of complying with some country's laws about those too? Or is it maybe the job of free software to defy oppressive systems?

[–] amadaluzia@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is it cool if we start implementing tools to track users’ race and sexual orientation for the explicit purpose of complying with some country’s laws about those too?

I cannot think of a law which could impact a significant portion of users like Brazil, Colorado or California, which tells operating system providers to store the race or sexual orientation of a person. Unless that time comes, why should they bother implementing that? That, in contrast to a birth date which you may provide, is complying in advance to future laws against such people, and is therefore wrong.

Or is it maybe the job of free software to defy oppressive systems?

Here's a better question: why should we encourage free software developers, who only make money from people donating to the project they are working on, to purposely defy the law and potentially net them a million dollar fine? Are we sending a message, or are we just dooming ourselves?

[–] Soot@hexbear.net 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

Homosexual activity is illegal in Uganda. If they pass a law saying your OS should track that, is it moral for developers to enable compliance with it? Or do developers have a moral duty to at least not go out of their way to enable that bullshit, even if they risk a gajillion dollar fine?

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 5 hours ago

Moral duty begins with contribution of any sort imo. But I still agree, this is a law that can and should be ignored. Don't think this pr is put from any actual pressure though yet, more akin to "soft compliance"

[–] amadaluzia@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 19 hours ago

Homosexual activity is illegal in Uganda. If they pass a law saying your OS should track that, is it moral for developers to enable compliance with it? Or do developers have a moral duty to at least not go out of their way to enable that bullshit, even if they risk a gajillion dollar fine?

I have so many qualms with this comment alone. Concurrently, I am not sure how to articulate them. This text might be a bit messy as a result.

To begin, of course it wouldn't be moral. Purposely complying with discriminatory laws is not at all a good thing. I don't think systemd will even bother adding such a thing, even if it was against the law in Uganda. The difference between a country like Brazil asking for the date of birth for a user and Uganda asking for the user's sexuality is:

  1. The latter has not happened, and probably will not happen; Uganda has much better ways of finding out if someone is gay without the OS needing to say that.
  2. Uganda's law is much less important than laws in 2 (potentially 3) different states in the US, Germany1 and Brazil.
  3. While it could be said that age-gating material is discriminatory, Uganda's hypothetical law is much more likely to risk lives. systemd would not want blood on their hands.

I imagine you put thought into your hypothetical to see where it stands, but I would advise putting more thought into it. Stuff like this will drain both our energy.