With previous Rexit's like the API debarcle etc. many users were left looking for an alternative, but with decision fatigue and bad UX etc. most did not find the Fediverse a viable option.

What needs to still improve, how can we be ready this time?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 15 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not sure what can really be done about that; the fediverse is, by its very nature, pretty complicated. It's at least as complicated as http or email, and those things are widely used but probably not that well understood by the average person.

I think people are accustomed to using things that they barely understand the inner workings of (car, microwave, computer, etc.) during their daily life. So, I guess my question is, to what degree do people need to know "how the fediverse works" in order to use it?

If anything, we probably have to change the way we talk about the fediverse to make it more streamlined for people. For example, instead of suggesting that people "join lemmy", it would be better to send them directly to a specific instance that we would like to see grow.

Then there's the friction of actually joining an instance. Some instances won't let users view content without registering, and some require you to "apply" for registration, pending approval. Both of those things are reasonable and justifiable, but at the same time I think they do create a barrier of entry that we may not want if we are going to try to attract more users.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It reminds me of this:

https://lemmy.zip/post/47438646

But yeah making the process of signing up and using the fediverse easier for users will go a long way. As much as I dont like bluesky, one thing they did right over Mastodon is making the sign up process dead easy for end users.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 1 points 3 hours ago

Sure, but Bluesky did that by not really being federated at all, especially during the early rush.

Bluesky is certainly a step or two better than Twitter, but I would imagine it's still de facto centralized around the main bsky.social server, as that's what the vast majority of users are probably using.Nowadays it's getting more federated, but it seems to still be very far behind where ActivityPub is.

So they avoided the challenges of federation by not really being federated in the first place. Mastodon doesn't have that luxury, since it was fully federated and self-hostable from the start. There was no half step and nobody else to copy.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 12 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

I find it really simple. I joined a site, I found communities, I posted.

It was honestly no different to using reddit, well without the spam and shitty far right losers.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

There's just one little hurdle: choose an instance when joining. Maybe it could just be some sort of "choose for me" and every instance gets equal new users, random. Of course with the option to "nope, I'll choose instance myself". Everything else is technical and a casual new user shouldn't be bothered very much by it. Some are very interested and dig in to the knowledge, some just want to scroll cat pictures and call it a day, and that is fine too.