I bite the bullet and gone to the dark side
this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
165 points (98.8% liked)
Linux
64394 readers
818 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Artix has gotton a real upsurge recently. At least it has on lemmy.
It's most likely where I'll be hopping if unavoidable age gating comes to systemd
I only switched to Artix cuz I like OpenRC
I like not using government and mega-corporation mandated systems designed for privacy invasion and control of what people can access.
Also a nice thing, my reasoning is just that I like a bunch of small bash scripts I can look inside and go "oh, so that's why it broke"
Gating would be up to every application, systemd just provides an interface/standard location for them to query
I could care less about apps, because I can just avoid them. My concern is the OS level stuff, and currently, all of the legislation is around requirements that the OS itself capture birthdate data.
The moment that becomes mandatory at the OS level, is the moment I drop whatever it is that is forcing that issue. Systemd was the first to pre-emptively comply with facilitating the change at scale, so chances are, they will keep doing the same going forward.
Just one more crack in the levee against computer privacy. This is always how it starts.
No one asked anyone to make that change but it was done regardless. The laws created in those states were (from my understanding) implemented defensively in a political sense due to how federal laws were being considered but weren't actively requested to be enforced technologically.
Those that don't see this change as a step in a regressive trend but are in a position to make changes are usually the ones that lead us further down the path, intentionally or not.