this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
174 points (97.3% liked)

Not The Onion

21141 readers
1593 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XPost3000@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

There are good uses for AI in science and medicine, primarily for number crunching and pattern recognition.

Not for making theories or decisions that require an understanding of those fields though.

Chat bots are just a cancer to humanity.

Here are some ways that AI has been helpful: https://crcs.seas.harvard.edu/news/10-wonderful-examples-using-artificial-intelligence-ai-good

^ I DO NOT AGREE WITH THE ENTIRE LIST ON THIS ARTICLE. ONLY SOME OF THESE DO I CONSIDER TO BE 'USEFUL'.

Edit: Fuck AI "art"

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

There are good uses for AI in science and medicine,

like puncturing patients' skulls because the machine god misidentifies organs?

The Machine God makes no such mistakes, to think as much is merely the weakness of the flesh.

+++ THERE IS NO TRUTH IN FLESH, ONLY BETRAYAL +++

+++ THERE IS NO STRENGTH IN FLESH, ONLY WEAKNESS +++

+++ THERE IS NO CONSTANCY IN FLESH, ONLY DECAY +++

+++ THERE IS NO CERTAINTY IN FLESH BUT DEATH +++

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)
  1. You think that is good?
  2. Did you read past that?

If it wasn't clear from the rest of the comment, I think it is a really stupid decision to put life or death decisions in the hands of a LLM.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago
  1. It's called a facetious statement.
  2. I don't know how to read.