Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers

220 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

sunbrothersco@lemmy.dbzer0.com

dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com

RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Intermittent seeding: Does IPv6 using 6to4, 6in4 or 6rd via a tunnel broker help? (feddit.de)

submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The problem: My download is fine but seeding is very slow and intermittent even for popular torrents. I think this could be improved using IPv6 via 6to4. 6in4 or 6rd, all of which are supported by my router, to discover more peers.

My ISP allowed me to forward the port so I am discoverable via IPv4, but doesn't support IPv6 and I understand the aforementioned technologies as a way to connect to a tunnel broker, which would forward my packets to the IPv6 internet.

However, they are another entity that can monitor my internet activity. Are there any, preferrably free, 6in4/6to4/6rd tunnel providers that are known to be torrent-friendly? Are there any firewall rules I should set up for my security, like only allowing IPv6 traffic to the qBittorrent port? My ISP doesn't care about torrenting so I haven't been using any kind of VPN. Should I?

Oddly enough, I have no problems seeding on a specifically Central European torrent tracker, which usually maxes out my measly 2 Mb/s DSL upload, but the dozens of peers at international trackers, some of which must be in Europe, barely leech data from me. Am I presumed to be slow because of a slow ping from the presumably American server, or is my disqualification from IPv6 so impactful? I find it strange as I can download from 20+ peers simultaneously and top out my 20 Mb/s plan.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough. I need someone to provide me with a way on how to remember which one was capitalized and which one small.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Byte is the 8x bigger one – longer word – capital B (but the word, unless shortened, is "byte", not "Byte"),
bit is the 8x smaller one – shorter word – lowercase b.
There is a roughly 0.8% difference per order of magnitude between 1024-based binary prefixes (ki=kibi, Mi=mebi, Gi=gibi, often incorrectly written as k, M, G) and 1000-based metric prefixes (k=kilo, M=mega, G=giga) but these ballpark numbers are not affected.

Anyway, do you think it's worth trying in terms of security against threats and law enforcement, or should I use a VPN on top?

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Thank you very much, I'll try to re-wire my synapses.

Concerning the privacy aspect: I'm really no expert on that. I believe a VPN either provides you with IPv6 and is the solution to both of your problems, or you're circumventing it and making it less secure by introducing a side-channel. I wouldn't do both.

If you want to protect from law-enforcement you have to read the exact terms of your VPN or tunnel broker. There are companies who keep logs and some who don't, some cooperate with lawful interception of your country. I don't know which one to choose. I suppose it's the same with tunnel brokers. And for security: I don't think a VPN or IPv6 tunnel does much for that.