this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
170 points (96.2% liked)

Not The Onion

21303 readers
1751 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/45996578

Democratic members of Congress know they have an age problem—and it’s hurting them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 103 points 1 day ago (5 children)

At a certain age, people stop working. And at an even more advanced age, people stop driving. It obviously shows that even the sharpest of minds age. So why the hell are people allowed to work until they literally expire. We need age limits for the government. I'm sick of old people so far removed from today's culture making rules based on Jim Crow era guidelines. Our last two presidents have been barely functional, dementia-riddled puppets AT BEST.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago* (last edited 16 minutes ago)

I just want to caution against us developing the stereotype that people’s capabilities slowly fade to zero, at which moment they die. That’s not always how it goes. People can die suddenly at any age, but the odds go up as you get older. You can die at 80 but still be productive when it happens. Your productivity can also go to zero years before you actually expire.

We have an elderly problem in US governance, but let’s not address it with a bunch of stereotypes about the elderly.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 35 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I was confused, because Obama wasn't dementia riddled.....then I remembered Biden existed.

Thats how forgetable his term was.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 36 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

With the notable exception of Obama, every US President since 1993 has been born in the 1940s. Thats over 3 decades with presidents born at almost the same time (most in the same year).

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

Boomers will never let go of power

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, but Clinton took office 30+ years ago. Bush took office 25+ years ago.

I get that they're old today, but that would be like 20 years from now saying Obama is too old to be president. Which 20 years from now WOULD be true, except that his term was 2009-2017.

Biden and trump? Yeah, I fully get why they're too old.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

Yes there’s nothing particularly odd about the first couple of names in this timeline. The point is what comes after them.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 20 hours ago

Yeah, but Clinton took office 30+ years ago

And is a little over a month YOUNGER than the dementia riddled fascist currently infesting the office.

[–] shirasho@feddit.online 7 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

The arguments against this are that old people pay taxes and should have their fair share of representation in government.

The problem here is that olds are going to nominate olds and the ideals of the young are being completely ignored, so the younger populations are not being fairly represented. The DNC and GOP are both putting their worst and oldest candidates forward.

All offices need an age cap of 65, and the Supreme Court justices need an age cap of 60 and have term limits of no longer than 5 years. Supreme Court justices should be nominated elected by the people to make sure they balance the needs of the people with the wants of the president.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago)

It's as simple as this(if only to me anyways). Experience DOES matter. Let me attempt to explain where I'm coming from, no promise I'll succeed

Forging relationships and networks with hundreds of people and organizations is incredibly valuable to getting things done. Doing something for a long time generally makes you better at something.

When that something is talking to people and convincing them of things you are trying to accomplish, being known to the levers that you need to push and pull lets you get better results.

I'm personally not opposed to much better cognitive checks before, and also beyond a certain age for all public positions that have real affect on how everyone else will have to live, but there are centenarians with full and complete faculties, not many for sure, but knowledge is power, even if the flesh is weak that knowledge is still very valuable.

If if I'm not wrong, then arbitrarily throwing away close to a century of experience just because of a number, and not competency is crazy to me. I fully admit I don't know how to responsibly design and implement such a thing though. It could easily be abused/corrupted so that's a problem to figure out unfortunately. But I do think it's possible to design such check from people much better than myself. And yes I realize nothing is perfect but that's okay because life is change and any system needs to be able to adapt to changes of modernity

That being said there are also other things we could do. One thing I've always thought would be good is we could revive the concept of an Council of Elders and give it some influence on the processes we employ our leadership. Something like an appeals approval thing or oversight committee with some type of usable lever they can flex when needed. I don't really know how it would work, just thinking out loud a little here. Kind of like a jury but not too much with power. I'm from North America and First Nations here still have long way to go to before past injustices are reconciled but I think as a nation we should include more of their cultural traditions in the way we govern the country.

I think I'll stop this stream of consciousness here since most people have probably dipped anyway and I'm running out of steam anyways

If young people voted as much as old people vote, this problem would correct itself

[–] Korkki@lemmy.ml 10 points 20 hours ago

Historically "retirement" was not a thing, you just moved to lighter tasks. People only really stopped working when they no longer physically and mentally could.

The thing you say about rich old fossils and cold war relics running the west, is a problem though. Their age isn't per se the issue, them being out of touch pillars of the status quo and being generally oppressive is.