this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
-117 points (9.1% liked)

Fediverse

41828 readers
515 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

PPPS: Here is a totally clarified title: An option to automatically block downvoters with configurable granularity for the scope of the block. See text for detail.

PS: By definition this was always going to attract downvotes, so I'll pay no attention to that. I just want to be clear about one thing: this proposed feature would (obviously) be read-only and opt-in. It is just a development of the existing block feature. It would affect nobody except those who choose to use it.

PPS: I was originally going to submit it to Lemmy issue tracker but I prefer not to use Microsoft Github so for now I'm putting it here instead.

This is a general proposal that concerns Lemmy specifically, but also other forum-alike software that uses ActivityPub, such as Piefed.

For me, the original sin of social media is downvoting (rant incoming). Specifically, its rampant misuse as a "Me no like!!" button. Apart from conveying totally uninteresting information (i.e. a subjective binary opinion), downvoting encourages schoolyard social dynamics and discourages heterodox views (and therefore debate). The nearest in-person equivalent (saying "shut up") is universally considered rude. At scale, the effect of downvoting is to brutalize a community that might otherwise be pleasant and welcoming. I believe this practice is almost always toxic and poisonous. Those who defend it (in good faith, I do not doubt) need to consider the possibility that it has helped to homogenize their communities into people like them (to caricature: insensitive males). Most ordinary people do not participate actively in social media. There's a reason for that.

No, this is not a popular position here (cf. selection bias) and so it will of course be... downvoted. But it's how I see it. I like to think that I've added some value to the fediverse with my contributions, but if there's one thing that regularly causes me to consider leaving, it's this. Going to Beehiv or Blahaj-whatsit is not a solution, because the communities I'm interested in are not there. Hiding downvote scores does not work because... it does not hide the downvoters.

Which gave me an idea. Given that the identity of downvoters is technically public, I propose a new setting: "Auto-block downvoters". That's it. Automatically hide comments (or posts, or anything) by users who have downvoted your contributions. Logical, no? They don't care for what I have to say, and I don't care for their inane negativity. It's win-win! Lots of possible variants:

  • Hide [ subsequent | all ] comments by users who have downvoted [ a post | a comment | anything ] by you [ in this thread | on this post | in this community | everywhere]
  • Hide [etc] by users with an upvote-downvote ratio lower than [ X ]% etc

Such a setting (especially #1) would immeasurably improve my experience of Lemmy. No exaggeration. I like to think it might also serve as a subtle incentive for users to be more generous and tolerant in their behavior towards others, but that is secondary.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] remon@ani.social 60 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Downvotes are a deliberately built in feature of this platform, so it would be really stupid to have a feature that punished people for using another feature.

If you're this petty about downvotes maybe move to another platform.

[–] Keshara@piefed.blahaj.zone 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Orrr, move to an instance that has the downvotes disabled. They don't exist if I can't see them ☺️

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

An instance removing downvotes can still get it's post downvoting by other instance.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The comments still do. As I said in the post.

[–] Keshara@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Okay I just reread your post, as I missed the bit you mentioned about instances like blahaj hiding the downvotes.

So a couple of questions for you.

You mentioned the communities aren't on the instances that hide downvotes.. Are these communities that live on instances that are not federated with for example blahaj.zone?

And also, you mentioned that instances that are hiding downvotes is also not a solution due to the downvoter and others still being able to see the downvotes. So I ask, why is that an issue for you? Why be worried about fake internet points that aren't even really tracked here (unlike Reddit for example), that you can't even see? Actual engagement in discussion between people is far more important no?

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which lemmy alternative is alive and has no downvotes?

[–] remon@ani.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No idea, if there isn't OP just has to write one I guess.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] remon@ani.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same bullshit as if tou don't like the usa just leave. This is 5 years old or lower mentality

[–] remon@ani.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

if tou don’t like

This guys shakespeares!

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You keep confirming that you act like a 5 years old. Acting like typos and language police

[–] remon@ani.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So stop being so interested in me you damn paedo.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago

Now you are calling me a pedo. You are really a 5-year-old kid; how is your parent allowing you to be online with no supervision?

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How does it punish anyone if it's an opt-in read-only feature? Are you against any feature that you might not want to use yourself?

[–] remon@ani.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm against features that undermine other features. Also I think votes shouldn't be public in the first place.