this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
191 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

21369 readers
764 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@lemmy.today 17 points 18 hours ago

One thing that I have wondered based on the steady flow of cases in which lawyers


not just in South Africa


have been shown to be using hallucinated text, meaning that they were just feeding stuff into some LLM and using the output, is how much legal text prior to LLMs showing up was basically just copy-pasted from other random documents authored by someone else, with lawyers not really doing the expected work themselves of ensuring that the text was appropriate. Or dumping work that is supposed to be done by a lawyer on some paralegal and signing off on it, or something like that. I mean, LLMs are probably an appealing way to half-ass doing legal text, but they also probably aren't the first way to cut corners.