this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
465 points (98.9% liked)

Selfhosted

59210 readers
1323 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the latest episode of "they will always sell you out" - they sold you out! Who would've thought.

Hoping for a good alternative client to appear, the writing is on the wall. Vaultwarden can't exist without "leeching" off of Bitwarden.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RonnyZittledong@lemmy.world 134 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

Jesus, I'm tired of switching password managers.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 6 hours ago (6 children)

KeePassXC + KeePassDX is probably the best option, with the downside of no way to sync easily (syncthing is probably the best option there)

I might switch back at some point, been getting frustrated with the bitwarden extension performance always being so poor.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 minutes ago

My first password manager was KeePassXC.

Hooked it up with Syncthing, and I've never had issues aside from the occasion database duplicate.

[–] auntieclokwise@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago

I use KeePass with KeeAnywhere. KeePass can natively sync over network share, FTP, or WebDav. With plugins, it can sync over SSH, FTPS, Amazon S3 compatible buckets (including open source compatible versions you host yourself), Azure, Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive, and more.

[–] elaina@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah the performance is what made me install the desktop app, but then it's 1gb in size

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 13 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Sync however you want. Syncthing, Nextcloud, Dropbox, Gdrive etc.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Syncthing is the way to leave Google Drive, etc.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

I use Nextcloud myself, but if people don't want to host a server or fuck with syncthing, they can sync it however they want as long as they use a strong enough master password/phrase (which they should be anyway.).

[–] tremble5218@programming.dev 2 points 4 hours ago

Rclone with any cloud provider is another great option that's seldom mentioned. I posted my setup as a comment on another post. You may find it here - https://programming.dev/comment/23849767

[–] german@pawb.social 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Merge conflicts are a concern for KeePass, especially for those that don’t want to resolve them. Sync is difficult. AFAIK this is a very common issue with Syncthing setups.

Also, the portability from Bitwarden to KP leaves a bit to be desired, though that’s probably 90% on BW.

[–] elmicha@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm using Keepass2Android (and KeepassXC). It can copy the database from/to an sftp server, so it can easily merge the entries. I don't have the sftp server exposed to the Internet, because when I'm not home, nobody will change the database at home.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I just got Bit warden this year! Gah. Where are we jumping?

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] testaccount789@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

Full circle to sticky notes on monitor.

[–] slate@sh.itjust.works 23 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

KeePass isn't going anywhere. They're also dragging their feet on passkey support, so you might go with KeepassXC.

[–] zeitverschreib@freundica.de 11 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

@slate

Wasn't there some commotion a few weeks about KeepassXC and vibe coding?

@RonnyZittledong

[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

Their AI policy looks very reasonable, and they certainly aren't vibe coding. Everything is rigorously reviewed and tested by a handful of experienced, competent humans.

[–] Dumhuvud@programming.dev 22 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, there was. It was forked because of that, actually: https://codeberg.org/ChiPass.

[–] wiccan2@thelemmy.club 1 points 3 hours ago

Link gives 404

[–] eightys3v3n@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

They also don't effectively allow collaboration though, which is my cheif reason for using a cloud hosted password manager.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

What is "collaboration" in this context?

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Parallel creating, reading, updating, deleting password entries by multiple users.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago

Whoa, thanks. I had no idea this was a thing...

[–] eightys3v3n@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Sharing passwords between groups of people so everyone always has the up to date version. Not breaking the world if two people try to modify the same entry as some file syncing solutions do.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Hmm, interesting, though isn't that a fault of the organization not having an account-linking system so that each person could have their own credentials but can still access the unified content? This workaround seems... flimsy, unless I'm not picturing a legit scenario in which no other method is as good, or something.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 hour ago

You know why most cloud based services charge money? For stuff like this, because it’s not free to implement and maintain.

Easy and fault-proof password sharing and syncing needs software and hardware to do. You either set it up and maintain it yourself, or pay for a product that does it - like Bitwarden.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Sure they do. Multiple people can have a file open at the same time. I use it for exactly this every day at work.

With KeePassXC, that is. I don't know if other flavors have different support. I use XC primarily for the browser extension.

[–] eightys3v3n@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

And you can both modify the same things without causing horrible conflict issues? And you can share only parts of your vault with someone rather than having entirely different vaults you have to switch between? I'm assuming you mean putting the file somewhere like Google Drive, and you can access it offline even if you can't edit it offline? For feature parity with Bitwarden, obviously ideally one could edit any time and it would resolve problems when it came back online if there were any but Bitwarden doesn't allow this.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, no conflicts. I don't know if you can only share part of vault; I just created a separate one for a separate team.

I wouldn't put it in Google Drive or anything like that. The separate sync logic will definitely cause conflicts.

I'm not worried about having access if I'm offline, because if I'm offline I'm not going to be able to log into anything anyway.

[–] eightys3v3n@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I guess a laptop, server, IoT device, or WiFi connection when your main device doesn't have internet is out of scope for you?
Like fixing my laptop and not wanting to type the new password into my phone instead of copy/paste, sync when online?
And how are you sharing a file, to multiple people anywhere in the world realtime ish, without a cloud service you or someone else hosts? Doesn't that necessitate some syncronization logic?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

It's hosted on a local network share, so we don't need Internet access.

If can't copy paste, I just type it out.

We use a VPN to the office.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

They’re also dragging their feet on passkey support

As... they... should, forever.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Two articles behind a paywall, one that won’t load, and another article that says the big problem with passkeys is…people are unfamiliar with them.

If anyone tells you that Passkeys are bad, they’re a liar. Way more safe than passwords, full stop.

Just don’t let Microsoft or Apple tie them to your device. You don’t have to do that.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Are you calling me a liar? That's pretty weird; it's not like I'm telling you to stick to passwords while I move to passkeys. With that said, though, get Bypass Paywalls Clean (Mozilla-only, as far as I know) and you'll never see another paywall again. I forgot about having that.

Just don’t let Microsoft or Apple tie them to your device. You don’t have to do that.

The problem is that this is where it's eventually going to lead to.

[–] fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

Not really, Vaultwarden/bitwa4den offer passkey support. When I log into a service a popup shows on my extension, I click it and I'm in. It's not gonna lead to device locking if you don't want to...

[–] tordenflesk@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

Took me like 5 minutes to move back to KeepassXC.