this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
160 points (98.8% liked)

Selfhosted

59572 readers
657 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey folks! I know a while back there was a kerfuffle because syncthing-fork for Android went dark, and then a new person showed up and claimed everything was cool and they'd been privately given the keys or something, and people were concerned. I pinned my fdroid version to the at-that-time-current release until we got clarity.

Well, it's been a while and I just noticed I'm still on that old release. So... how'd it turn out? Do we like the new person yet? Is there a promising fork y'all are using? Or is the project dead? I'm sure I could just go look at the repo, but I'm also sure the repo would tell me "yeah, we're all cool" no matter what, so I'm curious what the community feelings are. Have there even been any useful new releases since then?

Thanks!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] perishthethought@piefed.social 10 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

Man, the BasicSync app has a long list of permissions...

https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.chiller3.basicsync/

Why does it need to know my Location?

[–] Star@sopuli.xyz 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'm using BasicSync since a few weeks, the location permission is completely optional. This is what the app says:

Location permissions are optional and are only needed when restricting allowed Wi-Fi networks. Even if the permissions are granted, they will not be used unless there are allowed Wi-Fi networks configured.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

What a bs permission to have been invented.
It should be it's own special network permission or something but what the hell does that have to do with the general meaning of "location"?.
Just allow the app to see what SSID I am connected to if I want to allow that

Sry for having to endure my rant

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

It's actually a bit informative. I believe Android approximates location using the SSID/WiFi information, so it's not just network that it's used for.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Hm...Still so.
It should be its fully own permission to allow even if it belongs both to location and networking.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

I think the idea is that it is not something separately securable? I don't disagree, I'd like to be able to disallow any app not explicitly granted permission to use any method to determine my location. Unfortunately if Google can scan WiFi and figure out your location, anything with access to WiFi can too maybe?

I don't know. I love technology but this fucking surveillance state situation is really getting to me. Routers using WiFi signal passing through your body to identify and locate you regardless of whether or not you are carrying any tech and all the other shit I don't know about... ugh.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Location is such a weird permission...
For example the permission is also needed to find local devices via bluetooth (eyeroll)...
And even then, local device finding is a sub-permission of location...

[–] timochka@lemmy.zip 6 points 16 hours ago

I think that's more about telling users though that if they let an apl find local devices, that can be used to deduce your location.

[–] tinsuke@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

https://github.com/chenxiaolong/BasicSync#permissions

ACCESS_WIFI_STATE, ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION, ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION, ACCESS_BACKGROUND_LOCATION, FOREGROUND_SERVICE_LOCATION

Optionally used for stopping Syncthing unless connected to specific Wi-Fi networks.

And location isn't a permission granted by default on install (unlike Internet access), the user has to approve of it explicitly.

[–] dan@upvote.au 3 points 22 hours ago

At least it's open source so anyone can look at the code and figure out why it asks for the permissions.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 3 points 23 hours ago

To know if you are on your home network and use direct lan etc, rather than finding a sync relay in the cloud...something like that.