this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
141 points (91.7% liked)

Selfhosted

59662 readers
1204 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I got distracted from my work so I made some Continuwuity propaganda. Continuwuity is a lightweights Matrix chat server that you can self-host pretty easily. Give it a try :3

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 38 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

This is the homeserver written in Rust, right?

A suggestion: wherever a QR code is included, the human-readable content should be included next to it. Not everyone has a QR code reader handy, or their reader has the bad habit of immediately opening links or apps. In this case, I see that it just goes to https://continuwuity.org/ and is benign, but others may be apprehensive at naked QR codes.

(there's obviously an exception for QR codes that are intended to convey machine info, like TOTP codes)

[–] nykula@piefed.social 8 points 9 hours ago

Agreed that QR codes should be accompanied by text links for accessibility, because many times the scanning fails due to bad light, old camera or shaky hands.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I was very excited when I started seeing QR codes gaining popularity. That excitement was quickly shattered when everyone just started using them improperly and they just made everything more annoying 😮‍💨

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

What exactly is “improper use”?

[–] morto@piefed.social 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Putting simple things behind a qrwall. I once went to a presentation and they had that qr code to scan to get the certificate, and I went there without my phone, so I got no certificate (I needed it for academic bureaucracy). restaurants with qr-only menus also come to mind. Oh, I also saw once a school with the timetables mural with just qrs and nothing else written, so if new students didn't have a phone AND mobile internet, they couldn't find by themselves where and when their classes took place

[–] KingKong33@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Lots of people use Lemmy via mobile. How am I supposed to scan a QR code?

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Print it out and scan it. Use a barcode reader. Use another mobile. Upload it to a barcode decoder website.

[–] KingKong33@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Or I could just scroll past it and not give them the time of day because they were too lazy to post a link, you know, the primary method for navigating the internet for decades now. Why the need to overly complicate things?

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You could have done that, but here we are.

[–] KingKong33@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

Point being, if you can't be arsed to do the bare minimum and post a fucking link, why should anyone give your post a second look?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 6 hours ago

Basically anytime it's not printed

[–] JadedBlueEyes@programming.dev -4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It is!

Yeah, I see your point, and I included the link in the alt text. On the actual design itself though, any URL I wrote in could be completely different from the QR so it seems slightly pointless - especially as it would just be writing Continuwuity a third time haha

[–] notabot@piefed.social 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Including the URL isn't to act as a check on the contents of the QR code, but to act as an alternative for those who don't want to scan it at all.

[–] JadedBlueEyes@programming.dev -5 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

The alternative is to search the name right next to the code in this design

[–] KingKong33@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

Or just post the link.

[–] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

This is not a good idea: having to search means an implicit reliance on a search engine. Even with a trustworthy web search -- and those are becoming fewer and fewer -- why add this complication? The URL doesn't even have to be large; it just has to be readable.

Even worse is when there's an adversary: what would stop someone from buying getcontinuwuity.org but have it be pro-Big Tech propaganda, with tracking cookies galore, and then pay Google or Bing to put it at the top of the web search results?

Whereas in 2026, a URL is not confusing at all to include. People know what http:// or https:// mean. Even big brands might not own their own product name's domain. This exact problem came up just six days ago: https://www.neowin.net/news/paintnet-can-finally-be-downloaded-from-the-right-place/

The whole point of marketing is to reduce the barriers for people to find something useful or valuable. Adding an accessibility barrier is antithetical to that objective.