this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
363 points (94.2% liked)

Selfhosted

59693 readers
1066 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I got distracted from my work so I made some Continuwuity propaganda. Continuwuity is a lightweights Matrix chat server that you can self-host pretty easily. Give it a try :3

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 65 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (18 children)

This is the homeserver written in Rust, right?

A suggestion: wherever a QR code is included, the human-readable content should be included next to it. Not everyone has a QR code reader handy, or their reader has the bad habit of immediately opening links or apps. In this case, I see that it just goes to https://continuwuity.org/ and is benign, but others may be apprehensive at naked QR codes.

(there's obviously an exception for QR codes that are intended to convey machine info, like TOTP codes)

[–] JadedBlueEyes@programming.dev -5 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It is!

Yeah, I see your point, and I included the link in the alt text. On the actual design itself though, any URL I wrote in could be completely different from the QR so it seems slightly pointless - especially as it would just be writing Continuwuity a third time haha

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 2 points 17 hours ago

I can see a lot of opinions & comments on the QR part and, with respect, I'd like to add that I'm reading this post on a device where I'd like to view the site on the same device, so a QR isn't best for this platform.

I'd go a little further and say that QRs and really only useful for a mediim where you want the user to use a 2nd device (printed media, BSODs, etc)

Also putting the URL in the (for my reader) non-clickable alt-text doesn't help either

Again, with respect, you're making it harder for your audience to reach you, not easier.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)