Technology

59605 readers

4225 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

883

Wi-Fi jamming to knock out cameras suspected in nine Minnesota burglaries -- smart security systems vulnerable as tech becomes cheaper and easier to acquire (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 9 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world

244 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Khrounose@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (4 children)

This goes without saying but obviously the most secure will be analog. Unfortunately that is neither accessible or worth the time and trouble for the average consumer.

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Huh? If anything it would probably be even easier to jam.

[–] frostwhitewolf@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not if it's wired. But the same could probably be said for wired ip cameras

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

IP anything is generally far more difficult to jam thanks to TCP/IP checking for acknowledgment the data arrived and trying again - at a slower speed which can handle more noise.

Our cameras at work use wifi and Ethernet and have an internal SD card - plus a built in coin cell battery that can run for a little while. Obviously not cheap though.

load more comments (1 replies)