this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
277 points (96.9% liked)

Not The Onion

12344 readers
448 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/6682912

My dad was a white slave, Kentucky Republican tells NAACP

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 21 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's true that there were a significant number of white (European) indentured servants/slaves in the Americas during the first centuries of colonization:

From Barbados to Virginia, colonists long preferred English or Irish indentured servants as their main source of field labor; during most of the seventeenth century they showed few scruples about reducing their less fortunate countrymen to a status little different from chattel slaves – a degradation that was being carried out in a more extreme and far more extensive way with respect to the peasantry in contemporary Russia. The prevalence and suffering of white slaves, serfs and indentured servants in the early modern period suggests that there was nothing inevitable about limiting plantation slavery to people of African origin.

reference

Between 50 and 67 percent of white immigrants to the American colonies, from the 1630s and American Revolution, had traveled under indenture.

Wikipedia article

However, by the 1900s white slavery really only persisted in the form of sexual trafficking of women, which ultimately led to the passing of the Mann Act in 1910. It's also likely that the idea of an organized slave trade at this time was hyperbolic:

While prostitution was widespread, contemporary studies by local vice commissions indicate that it was "overwhelmingly locally organized without any large business structure, and willingly engaged in by the prostitutes."

To claim that her father was a "slave" in the 1930s is a serious misappropriation of the term.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 19 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'll argue to anyone that every Vietnam and Korean War draftee was a slave, or at least as much a slave as serfdom was.

As bad as chattel slavery, no, but forced into dangerous labor for the profit of an uncaring oligarchy by threats of violence, yes.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

We should have never gotten rid of the draft and we should have increased the odds of the rich and the leaders if this country being drafted to the front line positions. It would be a great way to make sure we don't take part in useless wars.

[–] DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

Rich people don't get drafted

'I ain't no senators son...i ain't no fortunate one'

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 8 points 9 months ago

I'd agree with this as long as it was a draft for general federal service, not necessarily military. We could draft into the park service, NOAA, NIST, the forestry service, BLM, heck I bet we could even figure out how to use draftees in DoE. I don't see any problem with a few years of required federal service for all citizens, and there are lots of options.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

If it were me I’d rather be forced to do field labor than be forced to fight a war.

Vietnam was pretty fucking bad.

[–] Fudoshin@feddit.uk 8 points 9 months ago

Sid Meier's Colonization taught me this!