187
Concerns over therapy ferrets used to kill rats at UK’s largest children’s prison
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
187 points (98.4% liked)
Not The Onion
21782 readers
1314 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Blame the editor; there's no such thing, legally speaking.
How do you mean?
If a child commits a crime in the UK, the Crown revokes their childhood licence; not legally a child, ergo not legally a children's prison
Oh my god that explanation is somehow worse. Thank you for explaining though. Childhood as a license 😱?!
Soon to become CaaS, Childhood as a Service.
The UK has young offender institutes, which are not, legally speaking, prisons. I would expect someone writing headlines to use the official terminology.
Separately I am assuming that the OP isn't perturbed by the concept of punishing children (over some threshold age, at least) for crimes, which might include this kind of punishment, but takes issue with the image conjured by the word prison (which may be wrong, and only they can say)
So... What's the legal distinction? Because that just sounds like "Child Prison" with extra syllables
I am not an expert so am not the person to ask.
In a way it is a child prison with extra syllables, but as I said, my guess is that the OP doesn't object in principle to a 17 year old being locked up if they commit a serious enough crime.
That’s fair, they should be using the proper term in the headline.