this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
129 points (93.3% liked)

Selfhosted

60074 readers
729 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
129
[META] Should AI disclosure tags [AI], [NOT AI] be mandated when sharing projects? (aussie.zone)
submitted 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) by SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
70 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Based on recent comments this feels like a discussion we should have. So..topic, basically.

I'm not looking to be chief noisemaker on this, but I stand by what I wrote in !privacy and what's in my post history.

https://lemmy.ml/post/48724623/26190950

Let's have at; do we want a [AI] and [NOT AI] tag. Why or why not?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 15 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

I absolutely don't want Meta Tags in every titles. It makes reading the list of posts super annoying.

I also don't feel the need to know whether there's some AI commits, but I do want to know if a project is largely vibe coded. I don't have an objective metric on where this line could be drawn.

I think the status quo is kinda fine. Some commenter will point it out and will get enough upvotes to be visible on first glance. It's not perfect but good enough for me.

[–] tko@tkohhh.social 2 points 58 minutes ago

I find myself commenting three questions on any post about a new application somebody developed.

  1. What is your experience in [subject matter of app]?
  2. What is your experience in software development?
  3. What percentage of the code for this app was written by AI? What percent was written by you?

Personally, I wouldn't mind if all new app posts were required to answer these questions for their post. It doesn't discriminate, it just asks them to lay their cards on the table for everyone to see. The community can judge from there.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

Some commenter will point it out and will get enough upvotes to be visible on first glance. It’s not perfect but good enough for me.

I don't necessarily disagree here, however there is always the edge case of a certain overly-vocal group being 100% anti-AI, and that any usage of AI is considered a crime against humanity.

I'm not part of that group per se, but I also want full disclosure. If you used AI to get things going and handled it yourself from there, that's one thing. Constant commits from Claude or whatever is a whole different bucket of shit I refuse to touch.

[–] EmoPolarbear@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

I don’t disagree. Perhaps tags at the end of post titles rather than the beginning, or tags in the body of the post? I’m not sure what people use to filter these things and how those different options would effect usability.