Selfhosted

60074 readers

729 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam.
Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

129

[META] Should AI disclosure tags [AI], [NOT AI] be mandated when sharing projects? (aussie.zone)

submitted 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) by SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

70 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Based on recent comments this feels like a discussion we should have. So..topic, basically.

I'm not looking to be chief noisemaker on this, but I stand by what I wrote in !privacy and what's in my post history.

https://lemmy.ml/post/48724623/26190950

Let's have at; do we want a [AI] and [NOT AI] tag. Why or why not?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I'll preface by saying I'm heavily against anything LLM generated and in a perfect world we'd have a full clean divide, just so my comment can be viewed in context.

I can't speak to them all but I would not count Jellyfin as coded by AI based on their standards. Yes, people have likely used LLM "tools" to write code they submit, but they expect a human to understand the code/request, understand it's purpose, what the code is doing, and explain the PR. A human is expected to fully own the work.

There's no way to enforce that as much as I wish, but I think it's a fair distinction between what would get an [AI] tag and and [Not AI] tag. Is a human expected to fully own and understand it, or is LLM code just accepted as is without full oversight and understanding.

[–] SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Fair. So we're talking about slop - and to that I agree.

Next question then becomes: does [AI] meta-tag in any way help you discern slop from non slop? There are comments and proposals in favour of it.

The counter argument is - slop is obvious...and even if it isn't (and you're going stick the thing on your own rig), you should probably do your due diligence first...which will uncover issues.

At which point, a scarlett letter isn't going to do anything useful, and may unfairly tarnish projects.

That 97% stat was from 2 years ago. It's surely higher now.

I don't think [AI] tag works, for a number of reasons, as others have identified. But the topic keeps popping up here and there, so it's worth mulling over.