this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
129 points (93.3% liked)

Selfhosted

60074 readers
729 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Based on recent comments this feels like a discussion we should have. So..topic, basically.

I'm not looking to be chief noisemaker on this, but I stand by what I wrote in !privacy and what's in my post history.

https://lemmy.ml/post/48724623/26190950

Let's have at; do we want a [AI] and [NOT AI] tag. Why or why not?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uuj8za@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago

I'm in favor of heavy AI users adding an [AI] tag to their posts. I don't think we have to worry too much about AI users trying to pass their work as organic. Almost all AI users I know proudly and annoying shout about how great the AI is. So I think only a minority of AI users would try to hide their AI usage.

I think we should encourage users to add [AI], but also make it voluntary. We need people to complain in the post when someone doesn't add the [AI] tag, but they should have. I'm guessing here, but I think the more people complain about the missing [AI] tag, the more likely the project used more AI. I'm guessing if the AI usage is low, like 1 or 2 commits out of 1000, then not as many people would complain.