this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
129 points (93.3% liked)
Selfhosted
60074 readers
729 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam.
-
Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title.
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm in favor of heavy AI users adding an
[AI]tag to their posts. I don't think we have to worry too much about AI users trying to pass their work as organic. Almost all AI users I know proudly and annoying shout about how great the AI is. So I think only a minority of AI users would try to hide their AI usage.I think we should encourage users to add
[AI], but also make it voluntary. We need people to complain in the post when someone doesn't add the[AI]tag, but they should have. I'm guessing here, but I think the more people complain about the missing[AI]tag, the more likely the project used more AI. I'm guessing if the AI usage is low, like 1 or 2 commits out of 1000, then not as many people would complain.