Selfhosted

60074 readers

635 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam.
Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

111

[META] Should AI disclosure tags [AI], [NOT AI] be mandated when sharing projects? (aussie.zone)

submitted 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) by SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Based on recent comments this feels like a discussion we should have. So..topic, basically.

I'm not looking to be chief noisemaker on this, but I stand by what I wrote in !privacy and what's in my post history.

https://lemmy.ml/post/48724623/26190950

Let's have at; do we want a [AI] and [NOT AI] tag. Why or why not?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

That way a certain subset of members could just drive-by downvote without getting themselves dirty.

I think tags could be alright but only if this is not allowed, it is unreasonable to ask people to disclose something just so others can shit on them for it.

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

it is unreasonable to ask people to disclose something just so others can shit on them for it.

I totally dig what your saying. I'm not a downvoter period. In my short time here at Lemmy, AI assisted projects are going to get shit on one way or another. It's unfortunate, but it is what it is. I think the narrative of this thread is to attempt to make things conducive to all users. I personally do not outright reject AI assisted projects. My main concern is if I spin up a container and it turns out to be a doughnut. AI assisted or no, unless you speak multi code languages fluently, you are taking a risk either way. You are placing your trust in the dev and the few that can read code.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 24 minutes ago* (last edited 22 minutes ago) (1 children)

you are taking a risk either way. You are placing your trust in the dev and the few that can read code.

There is definitely a trust issue and a need for ways of conveying and building trust in smaller software projects. I think a much better solution there would be discussions about the code and how it works that aren't hostile interrogations with foregone conclusions in pursuit of a broader anti-AI agenda. If someone just put a lot of effort into making something the details of that process should be on their mind, it should be possible to make them more accessible to people and convey that there is non-artificial understanding behind the project. Automatic hostility and suspicion makes those kinds of conversations harder and less likely.

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

Automatic hostility and suspicion makes those kinds of conversations harder and less likely.

You're preaching to the choir but I will give an amen.