this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
52 points (94.8% liked)
Technology
59534 readers
3195 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Vizio always had really good screens, but bad processers.
So when 1080 was the norm, Vizio was always a great bargain.
Their 4k is still decentish when your source is 4k, but they don't do a good job of showing 1080p upscaled to 4k
Since most people looking for a budget TV usually stream 1080, it can be a waste to buy a Vizio 4k, a 1080 would be pretty similar and a lot cheaper.
Or you'd want to spend the extra to get a 4k that's good at upscaling 1080 to 4k
Most people don't think about upscaling, and how much processing power it takes.
I like my Vizio tv, it’s pretty great but the “features” in it suck and yeah it runs like dogshit in the menus.
I use an appleTV as my source and couldn’t imagine trying to use their smart stuff.
My “budget black Friday basement Samsung TV” is … probably as good as the Vizio but “lacking features” that I otherwise have turned off on my Vizio.
The best part about my Samsung relative to the Vizio is the Samsung turns on without issue whereas the Vizio sometimes seems to take forever to wake up. This might be an energy saving feature of the Vizio vs Samsung but it’s annoying.
Vizio is fantastic if you’re using your own source, I wouldn’t rely on their smart stuff though.
I'd still refute that claim. I bought a vizio tv about ~7 years ago and it was perfect when I first bought it. A few software updates later and now the TV will switch to it's internal bullshit any time there isn't an input source for greater than ~3 seconds. It's infuriating that if my nvidia shield takes a second too long to push out a video signal the TV will just switch inputs on me. There is no way to disable this antifeature. The best part is after I noticed this behavior, I (at the network level) prevented all outgoing communication from this TV and it is still perfectly happy to just switch to a blank internal input whenever an external source takes slightly too long.
"If I can't track you, fuck you I'll make your TV basically unusable"
I just don’t have my TV connected to the network at all, I think there is an option (on mine at least) to disable the switch to “smart whatever” when no source. YMMV though.
I agree wholeheartedly though, I use my devices to power the tv on and off and when that fails it’s such a mess even just swapping inputs.
I connected it because it was in that like 2 year span where they had that a small android tablet as a remote. Legitimately cool feature but I should have known better than to let it update.
I’ve updated mine and it’s generally made it better tbh, at least insomuch as now that I have that setting toggled I don’t have to deal with hitting their smart shit.
I just always update it and then reset it, stay at the firmware level but set it up like a new TV and don’t connect it.
factory reset went back to the shitty upgrade version I upgraded to :(. But I will say that I haven't let it update since that initial terrible upgrade assuming it might get worse. Maybe I should try upgrading it once more and then lock it off if the next version is decent?
Black Friday models are specially made to have less features so they're as cheap as possible.
For Vizio, that's just normal.