this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
567 points (97.5% liked)

Games

16806 readers
867 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
567
Twitch will now allow "Artistic Nudity" following the viral topless meta (www.dexerto.com)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/games@sh.itjust.works
360 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Twitch Updated their Sexual Content Policy:

  • Changes: Certain content now allowed with labels
  • Artistic Nudity: Permitted under Sexual Themes Label
  • Game Nudity: Contextual; labels necessary
  • Body Painting: Acceptable with appropriate label
  • Mature Games: Label generally covers content
  • Stream Visibility: Impacted by content labels
  • Twerking, grinding and pole dancing are now allowed without a label.

Via https://twitter.com/Dexerto/status/1735024184114245689

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I'm troubled by the term "artistic". Who on earth is deciding what is and isn't art?

Seems like an ethical quagmire that's not really worth their time to be wading into, but they seem to be doing so. Perhaps they haven't thought all the implications through.

I do not understand why they don't straight up just make a 18 plus tab and be done with it. Why do they seem to have this moral objection to how they make money? After all I am damn sure the shareholders won't care.

[โ€“] Tattorack@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Hmm... I think what determines nudity to be artistic instead of porn is the presence of urns. Yes, if there's an urn you can immediately tell it's intended artistically.