this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
27 points (77.6% liked)

Games

16785 readers
837 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
27
Xbox boss Phil Spencer gets why Helldivers 2 isn’t on Series X/S, but he doesn’t see who benefits from it being PlayStation exclusive (www.vg247.com)
submitted 9 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pohl@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I think it will be a few years before the rest of the business catches on, but I actually think he is right about this. If you spend 100s of Millions on a game, you need to make money on it. It’s not some cheap thing you can use as a loss leader to sell some hardware. Winning the console war is no longer as smart of business as it was in past decades.

You have to look at the other platforms as retail partners instead of competitors. Game budgets are way too big to justify exclusivity in 2024.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

If you spend 100s of Millions on a game, you need to make money on it.

Well, it's on Microsoft to make Xbox compatible with Windows games. Valve did that with Steam Deck despite not even owning Windows.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think exclusives make sense for consoles since they are trying to get console users who will buy third party titles on it. And exclusives help push which console to decide on. So sometimes overall game sales for a system is more important than sales of an individual game.

[–] Pohl@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That is the traditional argument. I saying that game budgets have passed the point where it is responsible to use them for marketing tools and they have to be products in their own right.

Those insomniac leaks show that Sony is feeling the squeeze and is looking to find ways to make its first party offerings cheaper (strategic layoffs). When you need to sell 10s of millions of copies for the product to be successful, platform exclusivity is going to be a tough sell in the boardroom. Especially when the hardware wars has already been fought and Sony won it by a lot.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

When you need to sell 10s of millions of copies for the product to be successful, platform exclusivity is going to be a tough sell in the boardroom.

That's why Sony games are on Microsoft Windows now, so Phil Spencer already has Sony games on his platform.