this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
101 points (93.2% liked)

Linux

48287 readers
647 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What are the pros and cons for desktops ? EDIT : Thanks all. I'll try Silverblue, bazzite and more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

If you want to tinker with the system, if you want to install multiple DEs, if you want to test and change things on your own, you may not like the rigidity of atomic systems.

If you don't want to tinker with your system and you always want to have a working system, go for it.

In the future it will become easier to tinker with the system (I hope that it doesn't take the path of android). I hope that more happens within containers and that it mature even more. Maybe the de within a distrobox? That would be awesome but I don't no the downside of it.

Right now you are still an early adopter. It sounds like the future and for many it will be, but who know what's next. Especially companies have an interest in fedora's atomic distros with ostree.

[–] Virulent@reddthat.com 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Atomic desktops make all of that way easier though

[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] Virulent@reddthat.com 4 points 9 months ago

Because all changes are transactional so you can easily revert to a previous system state if you break anything

[–] waitmarks@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

With fedora atomic, lets say i wanted to try out kde desktop for a while. i would first pin my current build so i can roll back to it if i dont end liking kde with

$ sudo ostree admin pin 0

Then i would rebase to the kde branch with

$ rpm-ostree rebase fedora:fedora/39/x86_64/kinoite

Then just reboot. That’s literally it and i would have a kde system with all my layered packages and i could roll back to my old system at anytime.

[–] MajinBlayze@hexbear.net 1 points 9 months ago

I've been using microos exactly because I like to tinker. Just the other day I installed plasma 6 to play around with the HDR implementation, then decided that it wasn't worth it and rolled everything back. Worse case scenario I might have needed to reset kde configs in my home directory, but even that want necessary.