this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
172 points (93.9% liked)

Linux

48328 readers
641 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Basically title.

I’m wondering if a package manager like flatpak comes with any drawback or negatives. Since it just works on basically any distro. Why isn’t this just the default? It seems very convenient.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] phx@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The upside over Snaps is that they're not so controlled by a central source

I'd say they still share a couple downsides: a) use a lot of them and stuff is gonna get bloaty vs native packages

b) updating a library etc for security on your system can still leave you with vulnerable apps where the packages aren't updated

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Snaps are very much controlled by a central source. With flatpak you can add custom repos

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

Yeah that was what I said.

[–] justin@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 9 months ago

Generally using only a few flatpaks is where it's generally "bloaty". Adding more actually balances out the equation ans you have more apps using generally shared runtimes.