Games

16800 readers

673 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

[OpenCritic] Skull and Bones Reviews (60 Top Critic Average 25% Critics Recommend) (opencritic.com)

submitted 9 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

-IGN 7 / 10

-PC Gamer 68 / 100

-PC Invasion 4 / 10

-PCGamesN 4 / 10

-Press Start 6.5 / 10

-Try Hard Guides 8 / 10

-Cerealkillerz 6.6 / 10

-Merlin'in Kazanı 75 / 100

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Mad_Punda@feddit.de 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

People make fun of this, but AAA hasn’t been an indicator for the quality for a while, but rather the budget. Given Ubisoft worked on this for 10 years, I imagine it’s gotten stupidly expensive even for them. So, the term seems appropriate to use. We can of course still criticize that with that kind of budget, this is the best they could release to players after 10 years.

[–] avater@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

People also forget that this was mentioned to investors and not real gamers.