this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
986 points (79.2% liked)

Fediverse

28444 readers
636 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you're a server admin, please defederate Meta's domain "threads.net"

If you don't run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate "threads.net".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com 274 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Yeah dude let’s just federate with an instance maintained by a corporation that has undoubtedly caused a genocide in Myanmar by turning a blind eye to a far-right hate speech group that caused an entire fucking minority to flee into another country.

I don’t get why people are supporting and saying “oh it must be up to the user” like bro this is the company we’re dealing with. Fuck that fuck threads fuck zuckerberg i don’t want his shit cancer near something that’s going well so far.

[–] guriinii@lemmy.world 81 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Israel have been successfully pressuring meta to remove and shadow ban accounts sympathetic to Palestinians. The level of censorship is crazy.

[–] raoulraoul@lemmy.world 58 points 11 months ago (4 children)

OK, I'll bite. You got something more substantial than "I read it on the internet" to back that up? One reputable source on your accusation? Not sayin' you're lying/wrong, just asking for some verifiable proof.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Numerous actual popular accounts and news sources have been suspended. It was major news in the Arabic-speaking world in October. Meta even apologized for auto-translating Palestinian as “terrorist.”

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hate to say it but that's a fail on producing a reliable source.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

You don't have to humor the troll. We all have the internet we are all free to independently verify.

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You know, you have access to search engines too. You don't need to be lazy and treat the rest of the Internet as your personal stenographer/research assistant.

Fucking HELL, despite how increasingly easy it is to find information, it cannot keep pace with just how utterly fucking lazy people are getting.

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Fuck off. You were asked for reliable sources - a very reasonable request these days, and you replied with none. I was right to call you out on that.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Only if you tried searching first and didn't find anything. If it's on the first page of Google if you just try searching the claim, then other people shouldn't need to link it for you.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You know you’re responding to a different user right?

The irony is amazing!

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Then the fuck off goes double for them and triple for you.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

I see you’re a certified bad ass.

Ill leave you be, sir.

[–] Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

No, just no. If you want strangers to take what you say seriously then you should show the simplest respect by supporting your claims with the reason(s) you have them. Laziness is flapping your mouth off and expecting to not have to back it up.

[–] guriinii@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

At the moment this is coming from secondary sources from within meta so there are no articles about it that I'm aware of. But Palestinians and activists constantly have their content removed, account reach limited, and comments removed (which has happened to me multiple times). People also have their accounts threatened and removed.

These actions are visible constantly, meta have been doing this since the start. For example, when you go to someone's stories at the top it might show 4 or 5 stories, but when you click through to their profile there'll be 20+.

Some people I follow don't even show up at the top anymore and I have to access their stories via their profile page or if I've messaged them recently.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Well a good friend of my girlfriend is from Gaza. He has been posting translations from his sister's account of what it is actually like living there right now. Then some AI artwork behind stories of "this place was bombed, my friends just were killed, etc..." and he got a big notification on Instagram that "his account has been restricted for violent hate speech" even though he didn't incite violence even one time. He just has posts with 2nd person stories of the situation there.

[–] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

What are you some conspiracy nut? /s

[–] snek@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If they want to hang out with us, they can make an account somewhere other than thread, bam, done!

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

If they want to hang out with us, they can make an account somewhere other than thread, bam, done!

"make another account somewhere" isn't really what federation is about.

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Indeed it is, they're not saying you have to make an account on that person's server, they're saying that you can make it on a different server, that's the point of federation you can join other servers that are connected to them. It's not to be fully open without any limitations, because if it were then content moderation would be impossible.

Services like Nostr have this problem, they are like the wild West where anything goes and you can't do anything about it. To some people that seems great but the fact of the matter is those services are filled with right-wing trolls and crypto scammers (likely plenty of other nasty stuff as well) because they cannot be moderated.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Mastodon, Kbin, the new Lemmy 0.19 release allow on a per user basis to block entire domains, so I don't see how this is a "you can't do anything about it" situation. Just let users decide.

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Lemmy 0.19's instance blocking does not filter users, only communities, in addition it does not solve the problems of content polution because it does not limit interaction from blocked malicious users in any way, just hides them (it only really works under the assumption that they're not malicious users and the blocker is just throwing a fit). For these reasons it is not and cannot be seen as an a replacement to defederation.

Also as I already said users are 100% free to decide, they decide by choosing their instances. If you don't like it you're free to host your own or move to a more open protocol like Nostr. The idea of federation was built around the idea of communicating with certain instances and blocking others, not about users individually choosing the servers they connect with, Some servers do operate democratically but in the end the fediverse is designed around servers so servers have every right to choose.

Also I'd like to address the "defederation will kill the fediverse" claims I've seen floating around. It won't in fact it's a dedicated feature of activitypub and has been in use since forever, instances are able to block ones that go against their values either due to the way those instances are operated or the users they allow on them. This is how it's worked since the beginning and almost certainly how it will continue. Some users don't like this and believe that they should be able to access stuff no matter what, failing to realize that they do not own the server their account is hosted on, accessing content on other servers via activitypub requires the content be copied over to your home server, and if the admins don't want that they can block that server, you don't really have a say in it because it isn't your server. So either host your own where you do own it, or move to a more open protocol which exist for the purpose of user freedom and anti-censorship.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What do you think it's about? Because from my perspective changing instances is kind of the entire defining feature that separates it from commercial platforms.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's about connecting communities and having fail saves, not bullying.

[–] sour@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago
[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 11 months ago

Federation is about being able to communicate with other people even if they use a different platform.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I feel like that's exactly how it was billed to me, find somewhere that federates with who you want, and if that changes, you're free to move

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The choice of email providers is not about which one can exchange mails with GMail.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Some of the time it is though. Like Gmail has a pretty large list of IPs it won't deliver email from. When self-hosting, it's something you really do have to worry about.

The reason most people don't worry about it is that most people only use a handful of free emails and organizations that provide email addresses for their users spend time worrying about it so users don't have to.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

When self-hosting, it’s something you really do have to worry about.

So erecting artificial walls is not positive then. Good we're on the same page.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

No. I definitely prefer email with good spam blocking. I'm not criticizing Google for blocking mail how they do. It's pretty necessary. Which is also something you learn fairly quickly if you try to self host.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Google isn't blocking, it's moving suspected spam into the spam folder and users have the option to whitelist any false positives.

Blocking Threads completely with only "then fuck off" to the users is not what interoperability is about.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

No. Google will not deliver at all a lot of email. It doesn't even make it to your spam folder.

[–] ponik@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Excuse me sir, i cant be more agree with you

[–] aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)