Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54669 readers

417 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

sunbrothersco@lemmy.dbzer0.com

dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com

RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com

1080p or 2160p REMUX? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 11 months ago by s8m1t@lemmy.ml to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hey everyone,

I'm currently stuck between deciding whether to go for a 1080p REMUX or a 2160p REMUX and could really use some guidance here.

My laptop specs are as follows: I'm running Arch Linux with dwm (Xorg) and have configured MPV with hardware acceleration. Just to give you an idea:

- Screen Resolution: 3200x2000

- CPU: 11th Gen Intel i5-11300H (8) @ 4.400GHz

- GPU: Intel TigerLake-LP GT2 [Iris Xe Graphics]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] theKalash@feddit.ch 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Your post is lacking information. What do you WANT?

Do you really care about the quality and want 4k if possible? Are you trying to scale media amount? In that case, 4k remuxes will need an insane amout of disk space compared to 1080p. Do you need to support multiple people streaming, so transcoding and bandwidth is relevant?

Without knowing what you want to achieve it's impossible to make that choice.