Games

16812 readers

674 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

139

Palworld studio admits it can't "keep up" with cheaters, says anti-cheat solution on the way (www.eurogamer.net)

submitted 9 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I mean there's no point in debating in the first place if you've just drawn your line in the sand and don't give a fuck about anything else

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

"I don't want to hand over compete kernel and administrative control of my PC just to play a game" seems like a pretty reasonable line to draw.

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you like it, feel free. But it still isn't particularly conducive to debate if it's just your own line in the sand and you don't particularly care what anyone else thinks.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

The purpose of debate isn't necessarily to convince the person your debating against. It also helps sway others who might be party to the discussion. Just because I have a line in the sand re: turning over control of my computer doesn't mean I can't debate that point and offer my own reasons for taking that position, while someone contrary to that can explain theirs. Neither participant in the debate needs to budge in their position, but by both offering their reasoning it may be useful in persuading others to one of their sides.