Games

16800 readers

673 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

136

Helldivers 2 finally adds a much-requested AFK kick timer, stopping undemocratic glory hounds from twiddling their thumbs in perpetuity (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 9 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] huginn@feddit.it 3 points 9 months ago

I mean it's not a bank in that it doesn't have all the audit requirements etc but it's sorta a bank in that it's keeping track of transactions and state for every player every time a mission completes, which is a transaction that they really don't want to go wrong.

And at a guess that code is held together with spit and baling wire.

Napkin math: That centralized transactional account updates every time there's an end mission payout and with 400k concurrent players at 4 players per mission, say average 20 minute length (some missions 2 min some 40) that's thousands of transactions per minute.

Totally doable load for even a modest central server I'd think... Unless you've got optimization issues. Which I'd argue a central db that doesn't shard out at scale is an optimization issue.