this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
267 points (98.2% liked)

Linux

48310 readers
645 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Those are just app distribution formats. Since there's just 1 snap store which can deliver snaps, they're not comparable.

[–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Most people get their flatpaks from the same handful of places though, right? Flathub and ??

This isn't a snap specific issue is what he is saying. It could happen to other stores.

Also, my snap nextcloud is amazing and was the easiest to set up and maintain.

[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 months ago

Flathub has manual submission verification though, which includes the steps to build flatpaks. Reviewers (currently) would definitely catch fishy looking apps.

They've also implemented manual reviews in case of metainfo or flatpak permission changes, another thing for additional safety.

[–] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

People download and run completely opaque AppImages from god knows where and that's better than Snap Store which is hit with malicious apps so rarely it's actual news

Flatpak also has a system where any scammer and malicious developer can just roll their own flatpak repo and voila, nobody can stop them. If it ever becomes mainstream, it'll be a shit show worse than Google Play

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

You’re pretty much just rehashing a possible apt repo “vulnerability,” but at least with flatpak they remember where each package was installed from.

[–] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Anyone can create an apt repo and the override your system packages with new versions.

At least with flatpak only the applications you installed from the bad actor’s repo would be affected, though obviously they can still have a ton of malicious dependencies

[–] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This does not invalidate anything I've said

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 3 points 9 months ago

I wasn’t trying to, just pointing out that it was nothing new

[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Text files could theoretically contain malicious content. Why doesn't the format have a built-in virus scanner??? Is this what you're suggesting?

[–] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

No, but root-of-trust isn't really established unless you ONLY take packages that the distro's security maintainers actually maintain, Flatpak, Appimage and Snap are a bit of a no man's land. You have to trust the developers to be cool, independent of the tool, unless you as mentioned before use only FOSS software from the distro's main repositories. And yes, specifically main repos because any random dick can go and upload a PKGBUILD or make a PPA.

[–] lengau@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What Flatpak stores are there in widespread use other than flathub? (Additional servers that depend on the runtimes flathub distributes don't count.)

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 4 points 9 months ago

Elementary has their own for their stuff