this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
1249 points (89.4% liked)

Memes

45734 readers
683 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The USSR was a flawed form of Socialism, but was fundamentally Socialist. The majority of the economy was run by Worker Soviets, in a process called Soviet Democracy. The Politburo, ie the highest Soviet, had a massive amount of influence and power, but day to day decisions were made locally. I would agree, I don't think it was a particularly good form of Socialism, but I would still consider it Socialist.

Modern Russia is absolutely Capitalist at its core, that's the entire foundation of the Russian Federation. The Capitalists are the Oligarchs! The Inner Circle are Capitalists! just because it's a higher stage of Capitalism doesn't mean it ceases to be Capitalism.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The USSR was a flawed form of Socialism, but was fundamentally Socialist

Was the rule of law strong enough that decisions were being made by the people, or were they being made by authoritarians? Because if key decisions weren't being made by the people, it wasn't socialist.

The Capitalists are the Oligarchs!

The Oligarchs are feudalists, not capitalists.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, it actually was. The Politburo had outsized power, but the local Soviets ran most things. Again, incredibly flawed, but still Socialist.

Oligarchs are not land owners that take a portion of what food is grown by the Russian people, the Oligarchs are Capitalists.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oligarchs are not land owners

Oligarchs control the exploitation of Russia's natural resources. Can't get much more "land owner" than that.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Capitalists can do that as well, without being feudalists. You're tying an ancient peasant-aristocrat structure to modern Capitalism just to avoid acknowledging that Capitalism has failed Russia.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works -4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're trying to pretend that an oligarchy / dictatorship has something to do with capitalism because you hate capitalism.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

On the contrary, I'm acknowledging that Capitalist business owners have swelled and looted Russia very effectively.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works -4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Except it has nothing to do with capitalism.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago

It has everything to do with Capitalism. When the USSR collapsed and the Russian Federation came into place, Capitalists got much of the Capital, and are now the "oligarchs."