Linux

48310 readers

645 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

267

Snap store from Canonical (Ubuntu) hit with another crypto scam app (www.gamingonlinux.com)

submitted 9 months ago by mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

86 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I don't understand why people are so hell bent on hating Snaps. The architecture is literally better than Flatpak -- and I'm quite sure it's possible to run one's own Snap host. Some people say they're bloated and slow, well not anymore than Flatpak (actually less) and people love that?

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The architecture is literally better than Flatpak

Why?

I don’t understand why people are so hell bent on hating Snaps.

Every single time I tried snaps in the last years I had a bad time. Either they were slow to start, refused to work (Docker snap) or made my machine boot significantly slower. Granted, I haven't bothered in a year or so.

At this point they just released unfinished software that was not ready for production, forced it onto people and are surprised when everybody remembers snap as being partially closed source, slow and unreliable. Even if it's not now, that's how the first impression was and it's going to stick forever.

[–] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Refer to an earlier post on the downsides of flatpak, Snap basically doesn't have a lot of those issues other than the fundamental ones regarding a canonical far package

You may have used Snaps when they used XZ compression. XZ is a stellar compressor, but for static data. It compresses better at the cost of being slower, nowadays Snaps use fast algorithms tuned for faster decompression, so it starts a lot faster.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 9 months ago

Even if it's not now, that's how the first impression was and it's going to stick forever.

I agree with them on this.

[–] SolidTux@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

For me the main argument is the repo side being proprietary.

[–] GnomeComedy@beehaw.org -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I hate them because they make Ubuntu useless for a desktop in an enterprise environment. Snaps have a bug where they will NOT open with a network home directory, which is common for a business ... And now they've made Firefox snap only.

So for a business environment: you can't even open the included web browser. WTF?

Do you understand now?