this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
150 points (98.1% liked)
Technology
59534 readers
3195 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Maybe having private citizens control important military architecture is a bad idea.
Most military equipment and technology is built by companies. There are contracts and laws that prevent those companies from abusing that power.
If starlink is critical US military infrastructure, then the US government needs to draft a contract with SpaceX to supply that infrastructure where it's needed, and enforce it. If (when) Elon abuses that power, then he needs to be held accountable.
SpaceX has many contracts with the US government, and is prevented, by law, from doing certain kinds of business with foreign companies. There's a limit to how far he can push things without jeopardizing that relationship.
Just nationalize it ✅
US military is definitely aware of this obvious problem and they're probably in a planning stage of building out their own low earth orbit constellation of satellites that they fully control for military use. If I had to guess they'll contract with Blue Origin to build out this architecture. Elon is shown to be a security liability at this point with alleged drug use and conflict of interest with countries deemed adversarial to US.