this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
1249 points (89.4% liked)

Memes

45719 readers
1057 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] z00s@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I just wouldn't call it an empire, that's all. I'm not a historian but to me, empires are made by occupying other countries.

The US is a powerful nation of course, but they don't have the same focus on conquest as the other countries throughout history have had.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifest_destiny

Just ignoring the concept of neocolonialism for a second, most American land was stolen through conquest. That the American Empire is not currently aggressively expanding is irrelevant, did Rome not count as an empire when its borders were stable?

[–] z00s@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

That would be interesting, to compare the land mass of the US with the max size of the Roman empire. My guess is that the romans would win by a hair.

But the Brits would definitely win because they have Australia, which is almost as big as the continental US just in itself, let alone all the other countries they conquered.