this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
64 points (93.2% liked)

Selfhosted

40347 readers
329 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Networking noob here. I want to prevent all incoming requests except through a specific port, and that traffic is forwarded to a specific device on the network. NAT seems to do that just fine, it's almost like a kind of firewall by itself. What kind of threats are there that requires more than just NAT for security?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cron@feddit.de 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

This is true and typically called "Next Generation Firewall" or "Intrusion Prevention System".

However, these have three disadvantages:

  • They rely on signatures and many vendors only provide these with an active, costly subscription
  • They add complexity and possible error sources and false positives.
  • They require processing power and can easily reduce throughput by 90%.

These systems are quite common in enterprise scenarios, but AFAIK the exception in home labs and selfhosting environments.