this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
336 points (90.2% liked)

Memes

45719 readers
1057 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 77 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I know it doesn't work like that but I think it's mildly interesting

  • 57% of Argentina population is 25MM people
  • 12% of USA pop (amount who live in poverty) is 38MM people
[–] nifty@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, it doesn’t matter that the U.S. has more people living in poverty as what matters is the relative amount of the total population.

I know you know, but thought I’d say it just in case someone else didn’t get why you said “it doesn’t work this way”

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You're right from a hard-statistical point of view, but from a casual, layman conversation I think it is, as I said, mildly interesting.

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

It definitely is interesting :)

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] Lesrid@lemm.ee 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Because the US has several million more people living below a certain level of income, experiencing a daily misery but it's somewhat excusable because the ratio is smaller.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I dont know the metrics, but I assume poverty means different things in each country. I would think poverty in a second world country means that people are at a state where they have a hard time getting enough food.

[–] Lesrid@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

I would grant that even if the metrics were measured largely the same way you could argue or even observe that experience would be meaningfully different in some ways.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

why is anything interesting? It just is.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The issue is a lot harder to ignore when the person to your right and the person to your left is starving to death.

[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 2 points 8 months ago

Things got bad the last few years, but the hunger index is still only 6.4.