this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
162 points (96.0% liked)

Linux

48338 readers
475 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 64 points 8 months ago (18 children)

Finally. I was always wondering why they didn't name it Azure Linux in the first place.

[–] e8d79@feddit.de 37 points 8 months ago (13 children)

If there is one thing Microsoft is struggling with it's naming things. I work mostly with .NET and the regular renaming of products is just something you have to put up with. 🤷

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 41 points 8 months ago (10 children)

This is so true. We can see it with their Xbox game consoles as well: Xbox, Xbox 360, Xbox One, Xbox One S, Xbox One X, Xbox Series S, Xbox Series X. I'm genuinely curious to see what comes next. Windows also was not very consistent in their naming: 3.11 (version numbering), 95 (suddenly year based), 98, 2000, Me (suddenly abbreviations or words based), XP, Vista, 7 (suddenly number based), 8, 10 (suddenly leaving out number 9), 11, 12. What a roller coaster.

And that's only speaking about two line of products...

[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

At least with jumping from Windows 8 to Windows 10 there was a realistic reason for it. I don't remember the specifics but it was to reduce the risk of breaking third-party software coded with some janky way of determining Windows versions.

The rest of the naming jumps, I'm sure, were just the whims of whoever was in charge of the project at that time.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It mostly comes down to marketing reasons I assume. Me was marketed as in "Me", the computer for personal usage. The second Xbox could not be named Xbox 2, because as we all know the 2 is less than the 3 in Playstation 3, and bigger number is better number, so it was named 360.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don’t remember the specifics but it was to reduce the risk of breaking third-party software coded with some janky way of determining Windows versions.

Probably lazy detection for windows 95/98... The 9 might get parsed for those much older OSes...I know many apps were compatible with both 95, and 98... So they might just do a lazy check that 9 exists and call that "compatible". When a windows 10 named 9 might not necessarily be.

However, knowing how much old shit is still compatible in Windows, I'm not sure this would have been that much of an issue.

[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

That's more or less what I remember of their rationale as well. Apparently it was common enough that they legit considered it a potential problem.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)