this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
214 points (80.6% liked)

Linux

56606 readers
370 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Appimages totally suck, because many developers think they were a real packaging format and support them exclusively.

Their use case is tiny, and in 99% of cases Flatpak is just better.

I could not find a single post or article about all the problems they have, so I wrote this.

This is not about shaming open source contributors. But Appimages are obviously broken, pretty badly maintained, while organizations/companies like Balena, Nextcloud etc. don't seem to get that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hate them both, give me a .Deb (or equivalent) if you're gonna package it. And get off my lawn! 🤣

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Installing .deb files from random sources is also very insecure and not reliable for updates.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Less secure than blindly installing flatpaks or appimages?

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Appimages work "everywhere" so they are better for distributing malware.

Flatpaks are normally not installed from random sources and I hope it stays like that.

So yes and no.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago
[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

(Also Flatpaks are, at least in theory, sandboxed and can't mess with your system stuff unless you allow them to)

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Not yet.

The permissions are too comlicated (unlike "allow documents access" on Mac for example)

And there is no Desktop GUI integration for opt-in to permissions. So install, open Flatseal / KDEs settings, harden, then run.