this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
436 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2891 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Johanno@feddit.de 9 points 8 months ago (13 children)

So professional drivers, watched by their employer, are using those to escape the control.

Even if they allow them to disable the GPS, it would be a reason for firing smb. Or to cut their wage since, drivers with GPS on will get a bonus if they are faster. Or sth shit like that.

[–] DosDude@retrolemmy.com 7 points 8 months ago (5 children)

It's illegal to spy on your workers through a camera in most EU countries. Why should GPS tracking be legal?

[–] kick_out_the_jams@kbin.social 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A camera and GPS are two very different technologies with distinct capabilities that do not overlap.

[–] kadotux@lemmings.world 2 points 8 months ago

I mean they both will reveal your location at a given time, so I'd say there's some overlap.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is a safety thing. There are laws about how long you can drive without breaks because tired truckers kill people in accidents. They can't force a driver to actually rest when stopped, but if there's no law, then you know they'll never rest. I would agree if this was simply active monitoring of location on a company sedan, but it's different when the job is specifically driving for long periods

[–] DosDude@retrolemmy.com 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I agree. But the post I replied to literally describes a way for the employer to spy.

Rather than the employer spying, how about we keep the timer local on the vehicle. You don't even need GPS for that either. Vehicle on, timer starts. Beeping after set amount of time. Beeping gets louder for every 10/15 minutes ignored. Insert an alucap condensator and resistor to not reset the timer after a certain amount of time.

But I have no experience with truckers or their vehicles. So I might as well just be talking out of my ass.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

My experience with US trucking is it used to be done on paper. It probably still uses a lot of paper but electronic systems are common. The paper logs would be reviewed by the employer but could also be checked at road checkpoints. They could be easily pencil whipped, hence the move to electronic. There is a constant drive from the logistics side to get better telemetry about shipment speed and from governing bodies to maintain safety. Local storage of data isn't too feasible for access to that data when the trucks most at risk of violating limits are the ones that rarely go home. I guess it could have a standardized wired interface at inspection like obdii and checked as often as paper logs, but wired mobile devices are a rarity in any field these days.

[–] tissek@sopuli.xyz 5 points 8 months ago

It can also tie into mandatary rests, that the vehicle has to be stationary. And that is good thing as it makes it harder for emplyers to exploit their drivers.

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago

You are registering where your own vehicle is driven by an employee that should not be using it for personal things anyway. In contrast to his/her face, this is not registering anything personal about this employee.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Can you elaborate? Is it illegal to have security cameras in a business if that means that an employee may be on it?

[–] DosDude@retrolemmy.com 1 points 8 months ago

It's illegal, at least in my country, to use your camera to keep an eye on your employees. You can only view it in case of illegal activities, for example something being stolen, etc. You also cannot save the footage for more than a certain amount of time, unless it needs to be used for an investigation of said illegal activities. I think it was 2 weeks, but I'm not sure.

Using the camera to check up if your employees are working is illegal.

load more comments (7 replies)