this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
149 points (92.1% liked)

Games

16806 readers
967 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
149
Star Citizen 1.0 'Twinkles on the Horizon', Dev Says — 12 Years and $669 Million Later (www.ign.com)
submitted 8 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
68 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

But it's not been launched. It's kind of like all the people that were bashing Skull & Bones or Rainbow Six Extraction before they even came out.

Sure, now that they're actually out you can say people were right but I also wonder how much of that is self fulfilling prophecy. If you literally kill the PR for a product/game, it's really hard for any studio or company to come back from that.

Nowhere has this studio said the game as it has been seen by players is "done" or the launch product.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 4 points 8 months ago

They took $669 Million USD and they've provided content and services for 11 years, people can and should expect returns befitting those numbers. Problem is, though, the team clearly hasn't demonstrated the ability to make that sort of product.