this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2024
47 points (69.4% liked)

AI Generated Images

8074 readers
22 users here now

Community for AI image generation. Any models are allowed. Creativity is valuable! It is recommended to post the model used for reference, but not a rule.

No explicit violence, gore, or nudity.

This is not a NSFW community although exceptions are sometimes made. Any NSFW posts must be marked as NSFW and may be removed at any moderator's discretion. Any suggestive imagery may be removed at any time.

Refer to https://lemmynsfw.com/ for any NSFW imagery.

No misconduct: Harassment, Abuse or assault, Bullying, Illegal activity, Discrimination, Racism, Trolling, Bigotry.

AI Generated Videos are allowed under the same rules. Photosensitivity warning required for any flashing videos.

To embed images type:

“![](put image url in here)”

Follow all sh.itjust.works rules.


Community Challenge Past Entries

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
47
4 June 1989 (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by AplasticAenima@lemmy.world to c/imageai@sh.itjust.works
 

Bing

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Raykin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (7 children)
[–] DosDude@retrolemmy.com 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

The 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre was on that date. It's like generating an AI image of people falling of the twin towers, or one of jews in a gas chamber, or an image of the rape of Nanjing, or of the people in Hiroshima during the nuclear bomb. Extremely in bad taste.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

would you still consider it "bad taste" if it was a painting?

[–] DosDude@retrolemmy.com 2 points 2 years ago

It's not a painting. It's just an edgelord prompting "AI" to generate this image and (formerly) giving this image the title of "June 4th". The image itself is not the problem. The person posting it is.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)